Sunday, 24 February 2008

Mind Control in Europe:

http://aei.pitt.edu/5538/
http://www.nrc.nl/W2/Lab/Echelon/stoa1jan1998.html
An Appraisal of Technologies of Political Control,

Scientific and Technological Options Assessment STOA. Working document. PE 166.499
,

by Steve Wright Omega Foundation Manchester, 6 January 1998.
From the: Archive of European Integration (AEI), University of Pittsburgh USA.
This reports hints a few times at Neural Implant / mind Control Technology, most notably here:

3.2 Surveillance Technologies:
Neural Network bugs go one step further. Build like a small cockroach, as soon as the lights go out they can crawl to the best location for surveillance(22). In fact Japanese researchers have taken this idea one step further, controlling and manipulating real cockroaches by implanting microprocessors and electrodes in their bodies. The insects can be fitted with micro cameras and sensors to reach the places other bugs can't reach(23.) The other hints at Neural Implant / mind Control Technology, can be found here:
4 Developments in Surveillance Technology
4.3 Bugging and Tapping Devices
5.6 Second Generation Incapacitating Weapons
6 New Prison Control Systems
7.2 Torture Software
References:
(22) "Police tap into the secrets of technology", by S.Davies (and S.Hough), Daily Telegraph, 28 Jan. 1997 p.7
(23) "6-Legged superfly scuttles to our aid", by R. Whymant, Times, 29 Jan. 1977
These old 1977, 1997 references cannot be checked online? but are similar to these for more see: MC2 Neurally Enhanced Animals.


www.intercorr.com/roach.htm
Insects can do many things that people can't.,
by Eric Talmadoe AP july 2001, date google cached: 4 Jan 2008.
"Insects can do many things that people can't", said Assistant Professor Isao Shimoyama, head of the bio-robot research team at Tokyo University. "The potential applications of this work for mankind could be immense." Within a few years, Shimoyama says, electronically controlled insects carrying mini-cameras or other sensory devices could be used for a variety of sensitive missions - like crawling through earthquake rubble to search for victims, or slipping under doors on espionage surveillance.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/publications/studies/19991401a_en.pdf
"Crowd Control Technologies - An Assessment Of Crowd Control Technology Options For The European Union"

(EP/1V/B/STOA/99/14/01)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This study grew out of a 1997 STOA report, 'An Appraisal of the Technologies of Political Control' and takes that work further. Its focus is two fold: (i) to examine the bio-medical effects and the social & political impacts of currently available crowd control weapons in Europe; (ii) to analyse world wide trends and developments including the implications for Europe of a second generation of so called "non-lethal" weapons.
2ND. GENERATION CROWD CONTROL WEAPONS The report warns against adopting ever more powerful crowd control weapons as "technical fixes" and allowing the policing assumptions of the United States to organise, militarise and market public order options for the European Union without public debate or accountability. In assessing the effects of such 2nd. Generation weapons, the report advises that adoption of the principles of ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross) SIrUS project (which suggests that because of their viii technical characteristics and human targeting mechanisms, certain weapons should be banned because they are intrinsically inhumane or capable of causing unnecessary suffering). Since much of this work is shrouded in secrecy, the European Parliament may wish to request the Commission to report on the existing liaison arrangements for the second generation of non-lethal weapons to enter European Union from the USA and call for an independent report on their alleged safety as well as their intended and unforseen social and political effects.
NEW BIO-WEAPONS FOR CROWD CONTROL Evidence emerged during the course of this study indicating that advances in neuroscience modelling of receptor sites in the human brain, coupled with new knowledge of the human genetic code (emerging from both the Human Genome Project and the Human ix Diversity Project), is already opening a path for malign use of the biological sciences for targeted human control. Whilst the research is still embryonic, there is a risk of behaviour modification, race specific crowd control weapons and area denial technologies emerging with profound implications which need to be further
assessed in terms of both current capabilities and what the results of thee projects might mean in terms of the state of the art, which is rapidly changing. Given that the EC has already agreed to ban any weapons which directly work on the basis of targeting or otherwise interfering with the operation of the human brain, a new STOA study is proposed, covering the potential malign implications of human genetic modification research and related genome projects on human control weapons of the future.
5. ABUSE OF TECHNOLOGIES This process is perhaps most pronounced in the United States where for the last twenty years Congress has encouraged the US military to supply new weapons and training to the civilian police forces. This has institutionalised Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) squads in almost every state. A new study by the US CATO Institute warns that the mindset of the soldier is simply not appropriate for the civilian police officer. Police officers confront not an enemy but individuals who are protected by the Bill of Rights. Due to her experience with victims who have been tortured with electro-shock weapons, the Director of the London-based, Medical Foundation for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture Victims has described electro-shock batons as "the modern universal tool of the Torturer".290
6.2 Design, Role & Function of 2nd Generation "Less-Lethal" Weapons

There is always a marine with a rifle standing behind the one with a glue gun.
6.3.1 Calmatives The human brain has thousands of so called receptor sites. A receptor has been defined by Dr. Mathew Meselson as a molecule on a cell which when a certain other kind of molecule called a ligand binds to it, causes something to happen. For example: There are receptors in our brain called opioid receptors. The body manufacturers molecules called enkephalins and endorphins, which bind with these receptors; if the proper molecule binds to some of these receptors it alleviates pain, or brings on sleep, or slows down breathing or affects various emotions. As discussed in 6.4 (below) the Human Genome project will map these receptor sites, and eventually those which evoke sleep, obedience, submission, sexual display etc. The US military have undertaken research on these receptor sites for many years. Of the few that have been identified, some can cause temporary blindness; can make you think you are smelling something that is not there; can cause submissiveness or extreme anxiety.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
REPORT on the environment, security and foreign policy, 14 January 1999, PE 227.710/fin.A4-0005/99
Draftsman: Mr Olsson, Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
(Hughes procedure)
Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy
Rapporteur: Mrs Maj Britt Theorin
At the sitting of 13 July 1995, the President of Parliament announced that he had referred the motion for a resolution tabled pursuant to Rule 45 of the Rules of Procedure by Mrs Rehn Rouva on the potential use of military-related resources for environmental strategies, (B4-0551/95), to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy as the committee responsible and to the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection for its opinion.
A MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION
B EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Annex 1
OPINION
Legal aspects of military activities
26. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new 'non-lethal' weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions;
27. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its farreaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska;
28. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local and global environment and to public health generally;
29. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the governments of Sweden, Finland, Norway and the Russian Federation, to examine the environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings;
30. Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems;
(1) = Source: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). In 1988 global military spending totalled $1066 bn, compared an estimated $704 bn in 1997.
Last updated: 13 March 1999

Two parliamentary questions from:

Paul Lannoye (Belgian politician)
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-2004-1446+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
Parliamentary questions, 29 April 2004, E-1446/04
WRITTEN QUESTION by Paul Lannoye (Verts/ALE) to the Commission
Question which has lapsed pursuant to Rule 185 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Subject: HAARP project and Commission follow-up to the resolution adopted by Parliament in 1999
In its resolution of 28 January 1999 on the environment, security and foreign policy (A4-0005/99)(1), Parliament stated that the HAARP project was manipulating the environment for military ends (recital R) and called for there to be a STOA examination of HAARP, as a global concern (paragraph 24), in order to assess the impact on the local and global environment and on public health in general. In paragraph 26, Parliament called on the Commission to examine the possible environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings. Five years later, I am not aware of the existence of any such report. Would the Commission explain what initiatives have been taken regarding this affair?
(1) = OJ C 128, 07.05.1999, p. 92. Original language of question: FR, Question not yet published in the OJ, Last updated: 14 July 2004

and Hiltrud Breyer (German politician)
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=WQ&reference=E-2003-1453&language=EN
Parliamentary questions, 28 April 2003, E-1453/03
WRITTEN QUESTION by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission
Subject: European Parliament resolution of 28 January 1999 (A4-0005/1999) on the environment, security and foreign policy.
With reference to paragraphs 26 to 29 of the European Parliament resolution of 28 January 1999 on the environment, security and foreign policy (A4-0005/1999(1)):

  1. With regard to paragraph 26, has the Commission examined whether there are environmental and public health implications for Arctic Europe arising from the HAARP programme, and will it be reporting to Parliament concerning its findings? If so, what implications have been identified?
  2. With regard to paragraph 27, what steps has the Commission taken to establish and enforce an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings?
  3. With regard to paragraph 28, what steps has the Commission taken to conclude international treaties to protect the environment from unnecessary destruction in the event of war?
  4. With regard to paragraph 29, what steps has the Commission taken with a view to the establishment of international standards for the environmental impact of peacetime military activities?

(1) = OJ C 128, 7.5.1999, p. 92. Original language of question: DE, OJ C 33 E, 06/02/2004 (p. 120)., Last updated: 16 March 2004

One answer:

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2003-1453&language=EN
Parliamentary questions, 3 July 2003, E-1453/2003
Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission
The High frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP) for Arctic Europe is a military programme. The Commission has no competence, nor indeed the expertise, to carry out the examination requested by the Parliament in paragraph 26 of its Resolution. With regard to the requests made in paragraphs 27 to 29, these deal with international treaties and standards which are predominantly concerned with military questions, e.g. on disarmament, and therefore fall within the competence of the Member States.
OJ C 33 E, 06/02/2004 (p. 121)., Last updated: 30 March 2004

Compiler comments: "It seems that nobody feels anylonger responsible in the EU-Parliament for this matter."
There is some confusion too about the registration of this document: A4-005/99 versus A4-0005/99.
Dr. Nick Begich took part in the meeting of the EU-Committee.
see: Nick Begich page 34:
http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflash/ElectromegnaticWeapons.pdf,

US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights, A Study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons. by Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/publications/studies/20000101_en.pdf
NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN DEFENCE POLICY AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: A CHALLENGE FOR THE EU
The STOA Programme, PE number: PE 297.567/Fin.St.,
Version 1.3, 8 June 2001
Introduction: This report to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Parliament seeks to lay out options the Committee might decide to consider in regard of the future development of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). It is the final report of the study by TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory (The Hague, The Netherlands) and IABG (Ottobrunn, Germany) on 'new technologies in defence policy and conflict management'. This study has been ordered by the European Parliament, in the context of the STOA Workplan 2000 (STOA: Scientific and Technological Options Assessment, workplan ref. EP/IV/A/STOA2000/01/01).


Mind Control in EU National Legislature:

Psychotronics banned by Law in Bulgaria before collapse of communism.

Psychotronics ban in Belgium Criminal Law:
Strafwetboek: Art. 71. Er is geen misdrijf, wanneer de beschuldigde of de beklaagde op het ogenblik van het feit in staat van krankzinnigheid was of wanneer hij gedwongen werd door een macht die hij niet heeft kunnen weerstaan.
Penal code: Art. 71. There is no indictable offence, when the accused or suspect on the moment of the fact in appearedin a state of insanity or when he was forced by a power that he had been unable to resist.

Italian anti Psychotronics case:
http://www.avae-m.org/www.associazionevittimearmielettroniche-mentali.org/Sembra%
20fantascienza3-ultimo.htm
DOSSIER SUL CONTROLLO MENTALE E LE TORTURE TECNOLOGICHE, 2006 (DI M.FABIANI, CON IL CONTRIBUTO DI P.DORIGO, M.BASSETTI, M.SACCHI)


Mind Control Petitions:

Mojmir Babacek's : PETITION to the: INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS and
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/petition2.htm


President of Russia; Jeltsin's neural implant:


www.erixon.com/foto/b/b0jeltsin.jpg
http://www.digischool.nl/kleioscoop/camerascoop/rusland/jeltsin%201991.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7665457274624818421&q=boris+yeltsin

Groningse chirurg opereerde Jeltsin., De Telegraaf page 11, 28-04-2007
GRONINGEN, zaterdag; De woensdag begraven Russische oud-president Boris Jeltsin is in september 1999 geopereerd door neurochirurg prof. Michiel Staal uit Groningen. De ingreep moest Jeltsin afhelpen van de pijn die het gevolg was van een neurologische aandoening. Voor zijn neurologische aandoening kreeg Jeltsin van zijn artsen medicijnen, die hem letterlijk uit zijn evenwicht zouden hebben gebracht. Hij viel in het openbaar enkele keren om. Daarop werd hem drankmisbruik verweten. Staal wil niets over de operatie zeggen. Hij baseert zich op zijn beroepsgeheim. De chirurg vindt het onjuist dat Jeltsin als alcoholist de geschiedenis zou ingaan. Jeltsin stierf maandag op 76-jarige leeftijd aan een hartaanval.

'Jeltsin lijkt wel op batterijen te lopen'., Het Parool, page 2 27-04-2007
by FRANS PEETERS, GRONINGEN - De geheime operatie door de Groningse neurochirurg Michiel Staal van Boris Jeltsin, destijds president van Rusland, vond in Moskou plaats in september 1999, op een cruciaal moment. Eind dat jaar waren er verkiezingen die door Jeltsins kroonprins, Vladimir Poetin, moesten worden gewonnen. Het was van belang dat Jeltsin tot dat tijdstip gezond bleef en niet, zoals de grondwet in dat geval eiste, zou worden vervangen door de voorzitter van de Doema, de Russische volksvertegenwoordiging. Die zou zich immers als interim-president in de verkiezingscampagne kunnen presenteren als een geduchte concurrent van Jeltsins beoogde opvolger Poetin. De operatie in Moskou zou de implantatie van een zenuwstimulator hebben behelst, waardoor een einde kwam aan het 'dronkenmansgedrag'. Professor Staal wil daarover desgevraagd nu alleen maar kwijt: "U bent goed geïnformeerd." De ingreep moest ook geheim blijven om de president te beschermen tegen terroristen. Die zouden immers, mochten ze te weten komen dat Jeltsin het geïmplanteerde apparaatje droeg, dat op afstand kunnen storen. Duidelijk is wel dat de operatie slaagde; na de ingreep constateerde de nietsvermoedende buitenwereld dat het opeens beter ging met de president. "Het lijkt wel of hij op batterijen loopt," schreef een Russische journalist. Het Groningse team is naar verluidt na de operatie nog enkele keren naar Rusland gereisd om de patiënt te controleren. Dat moet volgens het verhaal dat in Groningen de ronde doet, zijn gebeurd in 2001, 2002 en 2005. Deze bezoeken zijn, evenmin als de operatie zelf, nooit uitgelekt.

Vragen bij de dood van Jeltsin., De Volkskrant page 11, 25-04-2007
by Anet Bleich, Ruim een jaar voordat Boris Jeltsin op die tank sprong en met zijn imposante lijf de conservatief communistische coupplegers tartte, heb ik hem een keertje persoonlijk mogen ontmoeten. Hij was op wereldtournee om zijn autobiografie te promoten en gaf een persconferentie in Amsterdam. Nou ja, hij hield een monoloog van 35 minuten, en als hem iets gevraagd werd, herhaalde hij een stukje daaruit. Hij was, meen ik me te herinneren, erg trots een Rus te zijn en hoopte te worden gekozen tot voorzitter van het Russische parlement, wat ook gebeurd is. Op mij maakte hij een onbehouwen indruk. Onsympathiek. Zelfs – al besef ik dat het onbescheiden of zelfs megalomaan klinkt om zoiets te zeggen van een wereldleider – een beetje dom. Wat ik in elk geval toen niet en later niet heb begrepen is waarom zo veel mensen, onder wie eminente Ruslandkenners, meer vertrouwen hadden in Boris Jeltsin dan in Michaïl Gorbatsjov. Gorbatsjov was begonnen aan de gigantische opgave om de verstarde communistische dictatuur stap voor stap open te breken en bloot te stellen aan democratische beïnvloeding. Glasnost (openheid) en perestrojka (ombouw, structurele verandering), waren zijn motto’s. Hij maakte een eind aan de bezetting van Afghanistan, sloot wapenbeheersingsakkoorden met de Amerikanen en verzette zich niet tegen de ‘fluwelen revoluties’ in Oost-Europa. De Sovjet-Unie waarvan hij president geworden was, hoopte hij van een supercentralistische commandostaat te kunnen ombouwen tot een federatie van gelijkwaardige deelstaten. Natuurlijk stuitte dit programma op enorme weerstand van gestaalde communisten en gearriveerde bureaucraten. Gorbatsjov slaagde er niet in zijn potentiële aanhang te organiseren. Of zijn streven naar een democratische en sociale unie onder een gunstiger gesternte kans van slagen had gehad, zullen we nooit weten. Want Boris Jeltsin, die in augustus 1991 de coup tegen Gorbatsjov afweerde, sloeg meteen daarop zijn slag. Hij hief de Sovjet-Unie met een pennenstreek op en nam de plaats in van de man die nu president was van iets wat niet meer bestond. Gorbatsjov vertrok in alle rust en zo kwam een onbloedig eind aan het door Stalin vormgegeven imperium. Iedereen gaf Jeltsin op z’n minst het voordeel van de twijfel. Hij poseerde als radicale democraat en groot hervormer. Dat hij die reputatie niet heeft waargemaakt, kan achteraf door niemand meer worden betwist. De twee gebeurtenissen die in geen necrologie onvermeld blijven, zijn de bestorming van het Russische parlement in oktober 1993 – honderd doden – en de oorlog met het naar afscheiding strevende Tsjetsjenië, dat toen nog geen broedplaats van Al Qaida-achtige radicalen was. Het is Jeltsin geweest en niet Poetin die Grozny naar het stenen tijdperk bombardeerde (de laatste heeft dat nog eens dunnetjes over gedaan). Toch was en bleef Jeltsin de lieveling van het Westen, de grote vriend van zijn Amerikaanse ambtgenoot Clinton. Waarom? Het voor de hand liggende antwoord is: omdat Rusland onder zijn leiding toch maar een democratie geworden is. Dat is min of meer waar. Er was persvrijheid, meer dan nu. Er deden partijen aan de verkiezingen mee die niet vanuit het Kremlin beheerst werden. Dat was voor Rusland heel bijzonder. Maar het is ook waar dat die prille democratie van binnenuit door corruptie werd aangevreten. De kranten kwamen in handen van miljardairs en werden vaak gebruikt om rekeningen te vereffenen. Als afgevaardigden in de Doema lastig dreigden te worden, kregen ze vanuit Jeltsins kliek een mooie flat of prettige geldsom aangeboden. De Doema gaf dan ook zelden problemen. Intrigerend is de vraag hoe het mogelijk is dat de Russische economie, de pensioenen, het onderwijs, de gezondheidszorg in korte tijd in één grote puinhoop veranderden. Waarom moesten de zogenaamd marktgerichte hervormingen in een moordend tempo worden doorgevoerd, zonder dat eerst voor een juridische basis gezorgd was? Waarom werden Ruslands natuurlijke rijkdommen voor een habbekrats aan de meest biedenden verkocht? Waarom werden miljoenen mensen in armoede gedompeld, terwijl een handjevol in weelde baadde met bankrekeningen in het buitenland? Waarom moest een verstarde, maar egalitaire samenleving met onmondig gehouden, maar goed opgeleide burgers worden getransformeerd tot een primitieve klassenmaatschappij? Dat u van zuipen hield, Boris Nikolajevitsj, was uw eigen zaak. Maar dat u het ideaal van de democratie in een moeras van corruptie en onrecht heeft laten verzuipen, is niet zo gemakkelijk te vergeven.



President of France; Sarkozy possibly suffering from derailed Cognitive Enhancement ?

See all videos on President Sarkozy "drunk" at last G8 SUMMIT in YouTube
http://fletcher.blog.20minutes.fr/images/medium_sarko-grimace.jpg
http://www.tageblatt.lu/images/journal/070607sar.jpg
http://grenoble-alternance.typepad.com/grenoble_alternance/images/sarkozy.jpg
President Sarkozy with bush
http://imgsrv.knx1070.com/image/DbGraphic/200706/582324.jpg

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

And here is another one
http://www.illuminati-news.com/micro-implants.htm

It is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life. Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved. In Sweden, Prime Minister Olof Palme gave permission in 1973 to implant prisoners, and Data Inspection's ex-Director General Jan Freese revealed that nursing-home patients were implanted in the mid-1980s. The technology is revealed in the 1972:47 Swedish state report, Statens Officiella Utradninger (SOU).

Anonymous said...

http://www.politiken.biz/implantat.htm

Microchip implantat, sinneskontroll och cybernetik

15.10.2003

Skriven av Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD
Fd chefsläkare i Finland

Den här artikeln publicerades i originaltext i den 36 årgången av den finskspråkiga tidningen SPEKULA (tredje kvartalet 1999). SPEKULA utges i 6500 exemplar och är en publikation skriven av medicinestuderanden och -doktoror vid universitetet i Uleåborg i Finland. Tidningen har skickats till alla medicinestuderanden i Finland och alla medicinedoktorer i norra Finland.

År 1948 publicerade Norbert Weiner en bok, Cybernetics, som definieras som en neurologisk kommunikation och kontrollteori, som redan var i bruk inom små enheter vid den här tiden. Yoneji Masuda, "informationssamhällets fader" uttryckte sin oro, år 1980, över att vår frihet utsätts för cybernetisk teknologi som är totalt okänd för de flesta människor. Den här teknologin sammankopplar människornas hjärnor via implanterade microchips med satelliter kontrollerade av superdatorer på marken.

Det första hjärnimplantatet gjordes kirurgiskt år 1974 i staten Ohio, USA men också i Stockholm, Sverige. Hjärnelektroder opererades in i skallen på spädbarn redan 1946 utan att föräldrarna visste om det.

Speciellt på 1950- och 60-talet satte man in elektriska implantat i hjärnan på djur och människor, speciellt i USA, då man hade för avsikt att undersöka beteende-, hjärn- och kroppsfunktioner. Sinneskontroll (Mind control) utfördes för att förändra mänskliga beteenden och attityder. Inflytande på hjärnfunktionerna blev ett viktigt mål inom det militära och underrättelsetjänsten.

År 1973 gav Sveriges statsminister Olof Palme tillstånd till att man implanterade fångar och Datainspektionens fd generaldirektör Jan Freese gav sitt tillstånd till att patienterna på privata sjukhus blev implanterade under mitten av 1980-talet. Teknologin beskrivs i 1972:47, Svenska statens rapport, Statens Officiella Utredningar (SOU).

Anonymous said...

And this...
http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/index_en.htm
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?info=EXLINK&reference=MEMO/05/97&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=de

Ethical aspects of ICT implants in the human body : opinion presented to the Commission by the European Group on Ethics

Reference: MEMO/05/97 Date: 17/03/2005

MEMO/05/97

Brussels, 17 March 2005
Ethical aspects of ICT implants in the human body : opinion presented to the Commission by the European Group on Ethics

The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE), chaired by the Swedish philosopher, Göran Hermerén, adopted on 16 March 2005 Opinion N° 20 on the ethical aspects of information and communication technologies (ICT) implants in the human body and presented this to the Commission. The EGE is an independent, multidisciplinary and pluralist advisory group, which is composed of twelve members. Its role is to advise the European Commission on how ethical values should be taken into consideration in the regulation of scientific and technological developments.

At first sight ICT implants are ethically unproblematic if we think for instance about cardiac pacemakers. However, although particular ICT implants may be used to repair deficient bodily capabilities, others are ethically more problematic, particularly if such devices are accessible via digital networks. ICT implants, due to their network capability could be misused in several ways for all kinds of social surveillance or manipulation.

The idea of placing ICT devices “under our skin” in order not just to repair but even to enhance human capabilities gives rise to science fiction visions with threat and/or benefit characteristics. However, in some cases, the implantation of microchips with the potential for individual and social forms of control is already taking place.

Anonymous said...

http://www.wodc.nl/images/1413d_volledige%20tekst_tcm44-116021.pdf

De hersenen in beeld
Neurobiologisch onderzoek en vraagstukken op het
gebied van verklaring, reductie en preventie van criminaliteit
132 blz

Anonymous said...

STOP BIO-Electronic/PSYCHOTRONIC TORTURE BRAINMIND/BODY CONTROL/ANNIHILATION ORGANIZED STALKING/TERROR SLAVERY ASSASSINATION WEAPONS!!!
Dear Sir, Madam,
Cheryl Welsh, Mind Justice: The Militarization of Neuroscience, By Hugh Gusterson, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Online), 10 April 2007
http://mindjustice.org/mindwarsatomic.htm
A Message For You, April 09, 2000, Part 3: MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL: MODERN TORTURE AND CONTROL MECHANISMS ELIMINATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVACY, by Dr. Rauni Leena Kilde, MD, October 23, 1999:
http://www.prophecies.org/Messages/april09c.htm
http://www.raven1.net/kilde1.htm
Christians Against Mental Slavery:
http://www.slavery.org.uk/news.htm
BIO-Electronic/Psychotronic BRAINMind/Body Control/ANNIHILATION Weapons:
http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=6205
http://freedomfchs.com/ffchsmessages/viewtopic.php?p=4276
http://freedomfchs.com/ffchsmessages/viewtopic.php?t=563
http://freedomfchs.com/ffchsmessages/viewtopic.php?t=563&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15
http://mindjustice.org/06-12-romero-book.htm#3
http://www.raven1.net/ravindex.htm
http://www.raven1.net/proventechs.htm
Resources / Other Sites :
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/resrc-hm.htm
http://freedomfchs.com/
http://www.remotemindcontrol.netfirms.com/
http://soleilmavis.googlepages.com/comments
http://indymedia.nl/nl/2008/04/51625.shtml
http://www.stopeg.nl/
http://www.natalyapolovko.narod.ru/
http://psyterror.narod.ru/
http://psychophysischer-terror.de.tl/Vereine-s-Organisationen.htm
http://www.catchcanada.org/#WhyisthisHappening
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/
http://web.archive.org/web/20070113132204/eharassment.ca/index.htm
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/archv-hm.htm
FREEDOM FROM COVERT HARASSMENT AND SURVEILLANCE :
http://www.freedomfchs.com/index.html
http://www.freedomfchs.com/id18.html
Covert Electronic Weapons Spiel, Eleanor White, January 2, 2008
http://www.raven1.net/ewepspiel.htm
International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System by Technical Means
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
Timeline: Electromagnetic Weapons
by Judy Wall, Editor, Resonance Newsletter
http://www.raven1.net/jwalltil.htm
BAN ELECTRONIC WARFARE ON CIVILIANS
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/synergy/index.html
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/synergy/signatures-1.html
Yours sincerely.

Anonymous said...

Senator John Glenn's Introductory Remarks on S.193

January 22, 1997 -
van
http://earthops.org/humex/glenn.html

Leopoldo said...

Microchips implants are not needed to track a human being 24 hours. But the disinformation apparatus keeps on saing this.

Leopoldo said...

A lot of disinformation spread in internet about microchips implants. Since the 70 microchips are not needed. Satellite microwave tracking technology exists since the end of the 60s.
Praga 69, Paris 68 student riots, all European terrorists groups were organised and manipulated using mind control satellite technology using Echelon military satellites. Paris 68 revolution was organised by Anglosaxon military intelligence using just operative military mind control remote technology to make individuals behave in an anti social manner. Since then, they have not stopped to fabricate revolutions in many countries around the world

Leopoldo Ridruejo Miranda
Independent association to report mind control technology being used for crowd control purposes and staging color revolutions

Leopoldo said...

All European police networks are manipulated everyday with remote satellite mind control technology.

Leopoldo Ridruejo Miranda

Magnus Olsson said...

Have a look at mindcontrol.se
Magnus Olsson (SWEDEN)

Anonymous said...

I KNOW WHY THEY ARE TORTURING US WITH THE SATELLITES

I finally figured out why they are using the direct energy weapons to attack and torture us with invisible, penetrating beams.

We all know that they want to be able to see into our heads and track us and control our behaviour. That technology is in it's advanced stages. The government has been telling us for the last 50 years that they can use their satellites to be able to see black and white still images of a license plate. The truth is though, this technology has advanced more than most. Not only have they been able to see inside our homes for decades; they have had the satellite ability to track us and control our behaviour with invisible penetrating beams also. Remeber, 95% of all vital information is indoors.

Lasers have been in outer space as long as communications satellites. All you have to do is consentrate the downlink on a communications satellite and add tracking capability and you have a space-to-ground laser. There was hundreds of billions spent on this technology that is now in it's advanced stages.

We know they are torturing us, but noone ever questioned why. Noone is going to track someone and torture them 24/7, 365 days a year for no reason. If you look at past photos (younger)of some of the now MAVERICKS on and near capital hill, you will see that these persons are not who they use to be. Some of the name include: the Bushes, John McCain, Harry Reid, Chuck Grassley, Orin Hatch, Richard Shelby, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Fienstien, Joe Biden, Bob Dole, Henry Kissenger, and many more that retired and now working back stage. The longevity of these individuals are off the charts. George Bush Senior and John McCain were both geeks in their younger days. The torture is making them look younger and more think skinded than they really are. These individuals are beating younger men and women with laser weaponry in order to make themselves look younger and more mature.

Once the ability of satellites to see though objects, and space-to-ground laser weapons become public property, like they should be, these individuals are going to look like old puss heads. These actions are being perpetrated by a cult of desparate dope addicts trying to make themselves look younger and more mature.

I'm looking to file a lawsuit to demand these satellites become public property since we are the ones that paid for them. If any mind control organization wants to have their name on this lawsuit, please contact me by email.

Any government spys that are spreading nonsense propaganda, please refrain from your absurd comments. We all know there are satellites looking through the roof at us. It's going to become public knowledge wether you like it or not.

Anonymous said...

Dear @Sir, @Madam,
PLEASE HELP THE VICTIMS!
http://mindcon.wordpress.com/
Thank you!
Yours sincerely.

efwefgwegf efwegwegeg said...

(1.) In few months the first kick in the world FOOTBAL CHAMPIONSHIP will be by a person, who can move thanks to a Bionic exoskeleton connected to his brain! It will be seen by billions. So brain-waves can be transmitted to a machine, which knows what to do. I admire this, the world should know about the advancement in this area! It is Great! It is called in the literature and EP law documents “converging technologies” There are even Law Projects in the European Parliament for usage of similar technologies. When I studied in CEU Budapest I was told, similar technologies are used by EC, ECB, USA Government for “Improving human capabilities”. In a European Parliament report from 2004 it is also said that: “similar technologies will be used against politicians in some countries”. When I worked in the Bulgarian National Bank before the economic crisis, I supposed, based on cutting-edge scientific research, that similar converging technology is used by the Bulgarian Politicians and the National Bank for some purpose. Now, the crisis in Bulgaria is deep and there have been protests for nearly a year in the country.
To punish me for participating in these protest with revealing SCIENTIFIC FACTS, the Bulgarian Authorities called twice to my relatives, and additionally with several hidden calls to threaten them to “sue me for schizophrenia for inventing reality”. The Bulgarian Court is not that advanced, and if influenced I am really threatened. To explain – schizophrenia basically means that there are lower cognitive abilities and hallucinations. I just took a course in Stanford for Statistical Learning, I suppose it is nearly PhD level with a certificate. I do not have confusion, but these are scientific facts as all the world will see with the first kick of the main sports event in the world in 2014. Please in connection with the World Championship and the “converging technology demonstration”, ask Commissioners Barroso, Malmstrom and European Parliament Members, as well as Martin Schulz and Jean-Claude Juncker or Mario Draghi how they are using or intend to use these technologies for democracy and if a person revealing their meaning and usage exactly as in the Scientific Report to the European Parliament and their projects for legislation in this area can be announced in an EU country, with hidden calls threats, for mentally ill for a Government revenge! Please ask them public ally or in Facebook and Twitter, or on their walls on the website, this is also important and interesting for you!
Please also for more information, like my profile at this link in support
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Georgi-Tchinkov/546290685485686

efwefgwegf efwegwegeg said...

(1.) In few months the first kick in the world FOOTBAL CHAMPIONSHIP will be by a person, who can move thanks to a Bionic exoskeleton connected to his brain! It will be seen by billions. So brain-waves can be transmitted to a machine, which knows what to do. I admire this, the world should know about the advancement in this area! It is Great! It is called in the literature and EP law documents “converging technologies” There are even Law Projects in the European Parliament for usage of similar technologies. When I studied in CEU Budapest I was told, similar technologies are used by EC, ECB, USA Government for “Improving human capabilities”. In a European Parliament report from 2004 it is also said that: “similar technologies will be used against politicians in some countries”. When I worked in the Bulgarian National Bank before the economic crisis, I supposed, based on cutting-edge scientific research, that similar converging technology is used by the Bulgarian Politicians and the National Bank for some purpose. Now, the crisis in Bulgaria is deep and there have been protests for nearly a year in the country.
To punish me for participating in these protest with revealing SCIENTIFIC FACTS, the Bulgarian Authorities called twice to my relatives, and additionally with several hidden calls to threaten them to “sue me for schizophrenia for inventing reality”. The Bulgarian Court is not that advanced, and if influenced I am really threatened. To explain – schizophrenia basically means that there are lower cognitive abilities and hallucinations. I just took a course in Stanford for Statistical Learning, I suppose it is nearly PhD level with a certificate. I do not have confusion, but these are scientific facts as all the world will see with the first kick of the main sports event in the world in 2014. Please in connection with the World Championship and the “converging technology demonstration”, ask Commissioners Barroso, Malmstrom and European Parliament Members, as well as Martin Schulz and Jean-Claude Juncker or Mario Draghi how they are using or intend to use these technologies for democracy and if a person revealing their meaning and usage exactly as in the Scientific Report to the European Parliament and their projects for legislation in this area can be announced in an EU country, with hidden calls threats, for mentally ill for a Government revenge! Please ask them public ally or in Facebook and Twitter, or on their walls on the website, this is also important and interesting for you!
Please also for more information, like my profile at this link in support
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Georgi-Tchinkov/546290685485686

efwefgwegf efwegwegeg said...

(1.) In few months the first kick in the world FOOTBAL CHAMPIONSHIP will be by a person, who can move thanks to a Bionic exoskeleton connected to his brain! It will be seen by billions. So brain-waves can be transmitted to a machine, which knows what to do. I admire this, the world should know about the advancement in this area! It is Great! It is called in the literature and EP law documents “converging technologies” There are even Law Projects in the European Parliament for usage of similar technologies. When I studied in CEU Budapest I was told, similar technologies are used by EC, ECB, USA Government for “Improving human capabilities”. In a European Parliament report from 2004 it is also said that: “similar technologies will be used against politicians in some countries”. When I worked in the Bulgarian National Bank before the economic crisis, I supposed, based on cutting-edge scientific research, that similar converging technology is used by the Bulgarian Politicians and the National Bank for some purpose. Now, the crisis in Bulgaria is deep and there have been protests for nearly a year in the country.
To punish me for participating in these protest with revealing SCIENTIFIC FACTS, the Bulgarian Authorities called twice to my relatives, and additionally with several hidden calls to threaten them to “sue me for schizophrenia for inventing reality”. The Bulgarian Court is not that advanced, and if influenced I am really threatened. To explain – schizophrenia basically means that there are lower cognitive abilities and hallucinations. I just took a course in Stanford for Statistical Learning, I suppose it is nearly PhD level with a certificate. I do not have confusion, but these are scientific facts as all the world will see with the first kick of the main sports event in the world in 2014. Please in connection with the World Championship and the “converging technology demonstration”, ask Commissioners Barroso, Malmstrom and European Parliament Members, as well as Martin Schulz and Jean-Claude Juncker or Mario Draghi how they are using or intend to use these technologies for democracy and if a person revealing their meaning and usage exactly as in the Scientific Report to the European Parliament and their projects for legislation in this area can be announced in an EU country, with hidden calls threats, for mentally ill for a Government revenge! Please ask them public ally or in Facebook and Twitter, or on their walls on the website, this is also important and interesting for you!
Please also for more information, like my profile at this link in support
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Georgi-Tchinkov/546290685485686